The CMOS image sensor is a full frame unit and supports 4K video recording at 30 frames per. And today, the R7 was announced, and now Im in a quandary about which is the better. This mirrorless camera from Canon has their lightest and most compact camera body. As Ive justified to myself, however, its all pretty relative because 5 fps is pretty fast after all. I love it, except for the slow burst rate of only 5 fps. Canon’s already shown with the EOS R10 that it’s willing to leave it out of cheaper models. Ive just purchased the RP, my first full-frame camera. JPEG performance shows some improvement in sharpening and detail over the 6D II thanks to revised default parameters, color remains a strong point. If Canon used that sensor, it doesn’t mean that the new model would automatically get IBIS. Key takeaways: In Raw, the EOS RP performs all-but-identically to the EOS 6D Mark II including good (but not great) high ISO noise performance. What about a ‘detuned’ EOS R6 sensor? That might make more sense, and Canon might have taken a look at what Nikon did when positioning the Nikon Z5 against the more advanced Nikon Z6 II. And a basic minimum for any new model would seem to be uncropped 4K video, which makes these older sensors even less likely. Unless Canon can drastically improve their performance with a new processor pairing, they don’t seem likely candidates. The 26MP sensor in the EOS RP and the 30MP sensor in the EOS R are both pretty old now, having originally done service in Canon’s DSLR range, in the EOS 6D Mark II and EOS 5D Mark IV. One possibility is a full frame Canon EOS R8, one step below the R7 for speed and performance and a more modest all-round camera for enthusiasts – but then Canon has never before given an APS-C camera a smaller (better) number than a full frame one, so that doesn’t seem very likely.Īnd then there’s the sensor.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |